Its an ok thing as long as it comes with a disclaimer that "results may vary" and "you have to know what you are doing" And those who work on it need to volunteer to help with the emails it may generate asking why they can't match the results =D On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn@gmail.com> wrote:
Le Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:10:32 -0500, Anthony Minessale <anthony.minessale@gmail.com> a écrit :
The problem is that performance testing is very fluid and relevant to each machine and OS and test performed and you can't get concrete expectations without some advanced skills in deploying FS.
Well, it could have a real interest by adding the tweaked parameters, may be there are some, yet unexplored, that would raise the response.
-- Why don't elephants eat penguins ? Because they can't get the wrappers off ...
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900