Are those variables being used in the outbound-codec-prefs or codec-prefs params in the sip profile? What does the "sofia status profile NAME" output show for "CODECS OUT"? -Steve On 16 January 2011 20:59, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing some strange issue with codecs. I have the following in my vars.xml file:
<X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="global_codec_prefs=G729,G7221@32000h,G7221@16000h ,G722,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/> <X-PRE-PROCESS cmd="set" data="outbound_codec_prefs=G729,PCMU,PCMA,GSM"/>
"inbound-late-negotiation" and "disable-transcoding" are commented in my internal SIP profile. So I guess I'm in Early Negotiation (default behavior) mode.
However, when I send a call to my provider, and I look at the SIP trace I see that FS is sending another codec, not G729 as I specified in the global_codec_prefs / outbound_codec_prefs parameters.
I'm sending calls like this:
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/internal/$1@38.102.93.70 "/>
Here is a SIP trace of a call:
http://pastebin.freeswitch.org/15042
I'm not understanding why FS is sending an INVITE with the G7221 codec in line 240, if I'm telling it explicitly that I want G729 as the priority when possible in the codec prefs options. But I see G729 in the 200 OK in line 291.
I've been told to use absolute_codec_string=G729 in my dialplan or enable late negotiation, but why if I'm already telling it to use G729 in the codec prefs?
my softphone IP: 190.23.80.10 provider IP: 38.102.93.70 FS IP: 77.92.65.126
calls flow like this:
softphone -> FS -> provider
Any help appreciated.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org