Hi, the voip protocols (sip & h323) had their genisys two decades ago - long before there were agreed on "best practices". putting the ip address in the packets made things like transfer easier to do, or directing the media to a different box. Derek. On Tue, 7 Sep 2010, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote:
But what idiot had the ip address in the data -- bad idea or so it seems to me.
Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
Why is everyone dead set on using IAX? you know SIP works fine and can traverse NAT if you know how to set it up properly.
/b
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:16 AM, Steven Ayre wrote:
Yuck.
On 7 September 2010 02:56, Jeffrey Leung <curriegrad2004@gmail.com> wrote: If you do really want to use IAX, there is a solution: Use Asterisk as an IAX protocol translator and have it to forward all the calls via SIP to Freeswitch.
---------------------------------------------------- Alternatives:
---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Derek Smithies Ph.D. IndraNet Technologies Ltd. ph +64 3 365 6485 Web: http://www.indranet-technologies.com/ "How did you make it work??" "Oh, the usual, get everything right".