For the Record: I installed Flite and PocketSphinx. They all work great. I went through the pizza example with my poor microphone and had no problem. The Flite and pocketSphinx installation are significantly easier than installing cepstral or lumenvox. I'm now interested in performance data for PocketSphinx. Any input would be more than welcome. Cheers, Klaus. -------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:21:15 -0500 Von: Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> An: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Betreff: Re: [Freeswitch-users] LumenVox Speech Starter Kit
On Sep 14, 2008, at 11:59 AM, Klaus Teller wrote:
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your reply. I found the following performance result on the Sphinx website: for a vocabulary of 5000 words, the word error rate is 7.3 %. Which is excellent for my purpose. My question is, does it apply to PocketSphinx as well?
Should be similar.
I raise this question because the Freeswitch wiki says PocketSphinx is great for smaller grammars without really saying what smaller grammar means.
5000 words is rather large. Even for lumenvox. You do know Lumenvox started its life as Sphinx2 ;)
Also do i need to train the recognizer?
No but its english only.
best regards, Klaus.
Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- GMX Kostenlose Spiele: Einfach online spielen und Spaß haben mit Pastry Passion! http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free/puzzle/616919...