8 Dec
2008
8 Dec
'08
4:56 p.m.
you would get a hangup event in either case.
yes, you are right. we just tested and saw that. the reason for sendmsg hangup, was the sometimes useful event-lock. it works with api uuid_kill as we wanted. but with sendmsg hangup it still does not work. shouldn't sendmsg hangup work like uuid_kill here? how useful could it be, to let it ring, when the hangup was already sent and is immediately executed when the anser is sent? #2 now works perfectly. thanks for the great support!