yes, do not use -hp <-- never swap and use more ram or -waste <--- hmm what does waste mean if you used the recommended ulimit -s 240 you would not need -waste for sure. use latest build on a 64 bit version of CentOS 5.3 and do not generate artificial load with misconfigured load testing tools. On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Ahmed Bhaila <ahmed.ajmal@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello
Has anyone have experience running Freeswitch for longer periods preferably more than 24 hrs with average connected calls around 500 at any given time? I have tried this and the problem I am seeing is that Freeswitch seems to use up all the physical memory after which the system goes unstable and doesnt accept any calls I also see a lot of dropped called after that. I have two test machines which I have started with the recommended ulimit settings (described in the wiki) and using -hp and -waste as the startup params. Both machines are Intel Xeon Quad Core with 8 gigs of RAM and running CentOS. The first machine is using the latest GIT-HEAD while the second machine is using Freeswitch version 1.0.4 (tried with 1.0.6 too but didnt help). Also, this is a production level scenario where I have customers sending in real traffic (signaling + media). Any recommendations and/or suggestions?
Thanks Ahmed
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Anthony Minessale II FreeSWITCH http://www.freeswitch.org/ ClueCon http://www.cluecon.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH_wire AIM: anthm MSN:anthony_minessale@hotmail.com GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale@gmail.com IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch FreeSWITCH Developer Conference sip:888@conference.freeswitch.org googletalk:conf+888@conference.freeswitch.org pstn:+19193869900