inet_pton is a problem with the ACL code that was added for ip acls on windows... MikeJ was working to correct that on windows which REV are you on? As for mod_shout hrm thats a very good question. /b On Apr 1, 2008, at 11:31 PM, Ritesh Singh wrote:
Hi,
The latest code from svn is giving the compiler error on windows platform as its not able to link to api inet_pton.
Also i found that we are not able to play the mp3 on windows platform as there is no project in the format named mod_shout, though its file exists at the location "src\mod\formats\mod_shout".
Thanks and Regards Ritesh
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:30 PM, <freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org
wrote: Send Freeswitch-users mailing list submissions to freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freeswitch-users-request@lists.freeswitch.org
You can reach the person managing the list at freeswitch-users-owner@lists.freeswitch.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Freeswitch-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. yahoo blocking. (Michael Jerris) 2. Re: Best way to start with Freeswitch (Mark Crane) 3. Re: Best way to start with Freeswitch (Matt Klein) 4. Re: Best way to start with Freeswitch (Jay Fenton) 5. Re: Best way to start with Freeswitch (kokoska rokoska) 6. Pong (Brian West) 7. Scheduled Hangup Issue (Nikolai Geordzhev) 8. test (Brian West)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:12:31 -0400 From: Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] yahoo blocking. To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <75AD88E7-738F-4350-BADE-7544B0FCFB2C@jerris.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Notice to yahoo users. We have been having ongoing issues with the mailing lists with yahoo, even after going through their white-list procedures. We suggest moving your mailing list subscriptions to a different e-mail account as yahoo seems to be rejecting or delaying many list emails. Also, please do not report list messages as spam. If you have any questions, feel free to reply privately to me.
Thanks Mike
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:32:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Crane <mctch@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to start with Freeswitch To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <933834.8886.qm@web56413.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
You want a fast webserver...take a look at: http://www.lighttpd.net/
"lighttpd powers several popular Web 2.0 sites like YouTube, wikipedia and meebo. Its high speed io-infrastructure allows them to scale several times better with the same hardware than with alternative web-servers." - quote from website.
Mark
--- kokoska rokoska <kokoska.rokoska@post.cz> wrote:
Brian West napsal(a):
On Mar 29, 2008, at 7:57 AM, kokoska rokoska
wrote:
Hi all!
I'm very new to Freeswitch and thus I'm looking
for advices/hints for
painless start :-)
Nothing is painless.
I have a lot of experience with Asterisk and
OpenSER, but the philosophy
od Freeswitch differs...
Thats an understatement. ;)
What is going on: I like to deploy PBX/Switch for a lot of SIP users wich registers with it and - also - with larg number of SIP gateways the PBX/Switch should regester with. Users population/gateways/call routing have to be dynamic (database-driven, like I'm accustomed form Asterisk and OpenSER) with quite standard features (conditional/unconditional forwarding, voice-mail, call-waiting, resource limits etc.) and especially with good over-all performance.
Like i red in docs, dynamic SIP users could by done with mod_xml_curl directory but I like to ask: Is it "fast enough"?
Direct DB in my opinion is a very bad idea. With xml_curl you can interface to just about anything and cluster it up and fail over rather easily with http gets. And no it's NOT slow, that depends on how fast your web server and db are... trust me it can scream if you do it correctly.
This question is a little bit off-topic, but I try it :-)
I have very limited experiences with webservers, so can you recommend me fast enough webserver and underlying tehnology?
For idea proof-of-concept I can use Apache + mod_php, but for production use I'm affraid it will be nearly useless because of PHP is interpreted and thus very slow. So what is - by your mean - good technology to start with? Java + Tomcat? Or is there a way how to utilize my "basic" knowlege of "C" without writting my own webserver? :-)
Have a nice day, best regards,
kokoska.rokoska
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
____________________________________________________________________________________ Like movies? Here's a limited-time offer: Blockbuster Total Access for one month at no cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text4.com
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:10:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Klein <mklein@nmedia.net> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to start with Freeswitch To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0803311307270.5743@ref.nmedia.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
lighttpd
Agree 100%.
Low overhead I've seen over apache etc.
m
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Mark Crane wrote:
You want a fast webserver...take a look at: http://www.lighttpd.net/
"lighttpd powers several popular Web 2.0 sites like YouTube, wikipedia and meebo. Its high speed io-infrastructure allows them to scale several times better with the same hardware than with alternative web-servers." - quote from website.
Mark
--- kokoska rokoska <kokoska.rokoska@post.cz> wrote:
Brian West napsal(a):
On Mar 29, 2008, at 7:57 AM, kokoska rokoska
wrote:
Hi all!
I'm very new to Freeswitch and thus I'm looking
for advices/hints for
painless start :-)
Nothing is painless.
I have a lot of experience with Asterisk and
OpenSER, but the philosophy
od Freeswitch differs...
Thats an understatement. ;)
What is going on: I like to deploy PBX/Switch for a lot of SIP users wich registers with it and - also - with larg number of SIP gateways the PBX/Switch should regester with. Users population/gateways/call routing have to be dynamic (database-driven, like I'm accustomed form Asterisk and OpenSER) with quite standard features (conditional/unconditional forwarding, voice-mail, call-waiting, resource limits etc.) and especially with good over-all performance.
Like i red in docs, dynamic SIP users could by done with mod_xml_curl directory but I like to ask: Is it "fast enough"?
Direct DB in my opinion is a very bad idea. With xml_curl you can interface to just about anything and cluster it up and fail over rather easily with http gets. And no it's NOT slow, that depends on how fast your web server and db are... trust me it can scream if you do it correctly.
This question is a little bit off-topic, but I try it :-)
I have very limited experiences with webservers, so can you recommend me fast enough webserver and underlying tehnology?
For idea proof-of-concept I can use Apache + mod_php, but for production use I'm affraid it will be nearly useless because of PHP is interpreted and thus very slow. So what is - by your mean - good technology to start with? Java + Tomcat? Or is there a way how to utilize my "basic" knowlege of "C" without writting my own webserver? :-)
Have a nice day, best regards,
kokoska.rokoska
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
____________________________________________________________________________________
Like movies? Here's a limited-time offer: Blockbuster Total Access for one month at no cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text4.com
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:27:37 +0100 From: Jay Fenton <jay.fenton@howlertech.com> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to start with Freeswitch To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <29204F46-E615-47B7-89E8-E2E4491050CD@howlertech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
lighttpd
Agree 100%.
Low overhead I've seen over apache etc.
Lighttpd's great, second only to Nginx http://nginx.net/
(Nginx benches a little less CPU heavy under load)
-- Regards,
Jay Fenton <jay.fenton@howlertech.com> CTO, Howler Technologies Ltd t: +44 (0)207 099 7095 f: +44 (0)207 099 7098
Registered in England & Wales, Company No. 06285634
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 10:11:01 +0200 From: kokoska rokoska <kokoska.rokoska@post.cz> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Best way to start with Freeswitch To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <47F1EE15.4070600@post.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Jay Fenton napsal(a):
lighttpd
Agree 100%.
Low overhead I've seen over apache etc.
Lighttpd's great, second only to Nginx http://nginx.net/
(Nginx benches a little less CPU heavy under load)
Many thanks to everybody for suggestion! I will look at lighttpd.
Best regards,
kokoska.rokoska
------------------------------
Message: 6 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:15:04 -0500 From: Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Pong To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <B91181C3-614A-44BE-BB69-440A7D213D51@freeswitch.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Pog...... Nothing to see Move Along!
/b
------------------------------
Message: 7 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:36:03 +0300 From: "Nikolai Geordzhev" <n.geordzhev@gmail.com> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Scheduled Hangup Issue To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Message-ID: <c8df2a130804010536l1fc92fbcha51a576d01f97cd7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi I`m a newbie to FreeSwitch. The project seems great to me, so I decided to use it as a B2BUA for the project that I`m working on. In my setup I need to be able to disconnect the call from the switch( end the dialog / both legs), so I`ve tried to use:
"<action application="sched_hangup" data="+20 alloted_timeout"/>"
The problem with it is that It starts counting the 20secs not after the 200OK (answer event) but from the 180 Ringing event which doesn`t work for me. Is it a bug or an expected behaviour? Can someone help me with this issue, I really need to catch the answer event. Thanks in advance.
King Regards, Nikolai Geordzhev