Oh, wow. I haven't even started to get into STUN yet. So far, FS has just worked beautifully without STUN. -N On Oct 30, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Brian West wrote:
Well not if they are configured properly and use stun... It shouldn't ever be the responsibility of the registrar to overcome broken clients... thats how we got into this SIP mess in the first place.
/b
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
Ok,
But don't I need the aggressive nat detection since most of my clients will be behind nat??
-N
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org