in this case, you would have two OpenSIPS boxes and two FreeSwitch boxes. The easiest scenario would be to run them in active/standby mode, so that only one box is handling the calls, and the other one starts acting only when it realizes that the master box is gone. Here is one of possible examples: http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment_OpenSIPS There are also some scenarios for active/active redundancy, but that requires much more engineering efforts.
________________________________ From: D'Arcy Cain <darcy@Vex.Net> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org> Cc: Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:07 PM Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Some questions from a relative newbie
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin@yahoo.com> wrote:
by the way, do you consider running a fault-tolerant service with OpenSIPS/Kamailio/Repro as a border controller and two FreeSWITCH boxes behind?
Thanks. I have added that to my reading list. However, I am not sure how useful that scenario would be. Doesn't the OpenSIPS router just become my new point of failure? If I add another box I can get my provider to fail over to it. That makes them the point of failure but they already are so I kind of depend on them not to go down anyway.
-- D'Arcy J.M. Cain System Administrator, Vex.Net http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:darcy@Vex.Net