Hi all, is there same situation with FS for Windows? I mean 64bit is more preferable than 32bit, isn't it? Any performance test on Win 32/64 were done? -- Best regards, Dmitry Kadantsev On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga@gmail.com>wrote:
intanto e il centos che si sta installando :)
grazie.
T.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Giovanni Maruzzelli <gmaruzz@celliax.org
wrote:
netbook remix
joking! Server 64bit :-)
-gm
Hi Giovanny,
regarding ubuntu, did you mean 8.04 server or desktop ?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli < gmaruzz@celliax.org> wrote:
Definitely go for 64 bit OS.
If you want to be safe and sure, go for CentOS 5.2 64bit. Is the one used both for development and for heavy duty production.
Also Ubuntu 8.04 is good.
Other versions/distros are less used by the community.
Adding RAM and CPUs helps to scale up.
-gm
Sincerely,
Giovanni Maruzzelli Cell : +39-347-2665618
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Tihomir Culjaga<tculjaga@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Giovanni,
thanks for the tip... indeed the db files were heavily used
regardless
if i started freeswitch with nosql option (freeswitch -nosql)... FS was not writing anything into that files ... instead it was just accessing it.... This behaviour leads to a waste of 40% CPU time... waiting for other processes (mainly disk access) to finish!!!
I moved freeswitch/db/ to a ramdisk and the performance got a boost to 140 CPS with a CPU load of 80%. I was keeping the machine for a while (20
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Tihomir Culjaga<tculjaga@gmail.com> wrote: -
30 minutes) on that rate when i sow CPU suddenly went to 100% and FS becoming irresponsive :).
What can be wrong? What are the limits in CPU usage (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%...) we should not cross? What fine tuning do we need in order to asure a long high load run?
Also, I'm running 32-bit OS (debian 5) on a 64 bit CPU... does it have sense to move my OS to 64 bit? ... will FS gain more preformance ?... I mean will FS perofomr drastically better 20%+ ?
Tihomir.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Giovanni Maruzzelli <gmaruzz@celliax.org> wrote:
Maybe your load comes from disk access?
Try putting the sql and log directories on a ramdisk.
OTH,
-giovanni
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Tihomir Culjaga<
tculjaga@gmail.com>
wrote: > Hello, > > i'm trying to use freeswitch as a redirecting server meaning FS has > to > receive an INVITE and according to some rules it will redirect calls > to > other destinations. > > > CALLING_USER FREESWITCH > SOMEWHERE > > INVITE -------------------------------> > <------------------------------ 100 Trying > <------------------------------ 302 Moved Temporary > ACK -------------------------------> > > > INVITE---------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > > > Well, wverything works well except i have perfromance issues .... on > my > HW > FS cannot do more than 40 CPS (INVITE answered by 302 Moved > Temporary). > When > i increase the rate, FS starts delaying 302 response. Right at 50 CPS > i > see > "calls" being build up in FS and the delay begining to grow. > > When i observe the machine, load average is almost nothing (load > average: > 1.41, 0.61, 0.60) CPU never goes to 100%, and i see only one thread > taking > most load... all others are just sitting there with 1-5 % CPU time. > This looks to me as FS handles 302 messages in a single thread?!?! > > > tculjaga@FS:/usr/local/freeswitch/conf/dialplan$ top -H > > top - 10:41:37 up 167 days, 20:42, 3 users, load average: 1.41, > 0.61, > 0.60 > Tasks: 83 total, 2 running, 81 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 25.3%us, 1.5%sy, 0.0%ni, 30.3%id, 42.7%wa, 0.0%hi, > 0.2%si, > 0.0%st > Mem: 2074520k total, 571244k used, 1503276k free, 259604k > buffers > Swap: 2650684k total, 3020k used, 2647664k free, 153868k > cached > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ > COMMAND > 4814 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 38 1.0 3:10.29 > freeswitch > 4800 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 6 1.0 0:08.26 > freeswitch > 4798 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 R 5 1.0 0:24.46 > freeswitch > 4787 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 2 1.0 0:11.24 > freeswitch > 4794 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 1 1.0 0:11.42 > freeswitch > 4803 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 1 1.0 0:11.74 > freeswitch > 4788 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 1 1.0 0:02.96 > freeswitch > 4804 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 1 1.0 0:01.64 > freeswitch > 4807 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 1 1.0 0:01.68 > freeswitch > 4811 root 20 0 34188 20m 3780 S 1 1.0 0:02.50 > freeswitch > > > > cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5140 @ 2.33GHz > stepping : 6 > cpu MHz : 2333.560 > cache size : 4096 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 2 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 2 > apicid : 0 > initial apicid : 0 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 10 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr > pge > mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm > constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 > ssse3 > cx16 > xtpr dca lahf_lm > bogomips : 4670.78 > clflush size : 64 > power management: > > processor : 1 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5140 @ 2.33GHz > stepping : 6 > cpu MHz : 2333.560 > cache size : 4096 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 2 > core id : 1 > cpu cores : 2 > apicid : 1 > initial apicid : 1 > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 10 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr > pge > mca > cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe lm > constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 > ssse3 > cx16 > xtpr dca lahf_lm > bogomips : 4666.82 > clflush size : 64 > power management: > > > > uname -a > Linux l01sipindir1 2.6.26-1-686 #1 SMP Sat Jan 10 18:29:31 UTC 2009 > i686 > GNU/Linux > > > > Of course, i've tuned the machine up > > ulimit -c unlimited > ulimit -d unlimited > ulimit -f unlimited > ulimit -i unlimited > ulimit -n 999999 > ulimit -q unlimited > ulimit -u unlimited > ulimit -v unlimited > ulimit -x unlimited > ulimit -s 240 > ulimit -l unlimited > ulimit -a > > > Started FS with minimum modules but still 40 CPS seems to be the > limit. > > > So, is there any way to improve performance? > > > Tihomir. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > > UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE: http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org