12 Feb
2010
12 Feb
'10
2:55 p.m.
Excellent idea. ;) BTW it does everything FreeSWITCH can do already. :P /b On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:49 AM, EdPimentl wrote:
Why not take the positive approach and if there are features, you want FScomm to support, then develop it, or put up a bounty for it. This would be a more productive and welcome alternative.