13 Sep
2013
13 Sep
'13
7:42 p.m.
Voting isn't going to do much here… the question is, is someone motivated to do the work and create a patch. I see no reason we would reject a good working tested patch for this. Mike On Sep 13, 2013, at 2:18 PM, EL <fs.user@fordior.net> wrote:
I'm voting (if I may) for a newer TLS version (1.2) and I share your concerns regarding security/privacy. I respect a 'secure by default' approach like for example the OpenBSD project. If you ask me, the whole security topic is today still nothing compared to what it will become in a few years... (It's annoying that so many devices still only support unencrypted sip/rtp these days.)