I really don't think it is as: 1/ i was not able to find a parameter to alter the INVITE URI 2/ FS itself has a parameter to change the behaviour and use the SIP To instead of the INVITE URI as the destination_number, so it would tend to prove that it's the other party's job to use the right field. David (Allen, I am not talking to myself :) ), can you give us some examples of PBXs who rely only on the INVITE URI ? Are you sure they don't have a parameter to change that ? David Ponzone Direction Technique email: david.ponzone@ipeva.fr tel: 01 74 03 18 97 gsm: 06 66 98 76 34 Service Client IPeva tel: 0811 46 26 26 www.ipeva.fr - www.ipeva-studio.com Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur. Le 12/10/2010 à 07:18, Michael Collins a écrit :
Ah, I was reading too much into that.
If I understand correctly you need to send the INVITE to the actual endpoint, but you need the target URI be the same as the URI in the To: field? Is that even legal in SIP? (Not that legal matters since vendors do whatever they want anyway...)
-MC
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:59 PM, David Allen <thedjallen@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Michael,
Its a SIP UA that registers locally to Freeswitch.
Regards, David
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:
What is a "dynamically registered SIP user"? -MC
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:32 PM, David Allen <thedjallen@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to send multiple Direct Indial Numbers down to a
dynamically
registered SIP User. I need to ensure that both the To and Target URI contain the direct Indial number. I'm able to modify the SIP TO Header of a call that is sent to them like below:
<action application="bridge" data="sofia/external/56778977%${domain}^61390009000"/>
which sends the request as:
INVITE sip:56778977@192.168.22.2:5061 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.0.155.73;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXeND9cHtgKF2j
Max-Forwards: 69
From: "0390001000" <sip:
0390001000@192.168.2.200>;tag=K4HHaZ9v1H07Q
To: <sip:61390009000@192.168.2.200>
But in order to maintain compatability with a number of PBX's/VoIP devices on the market, I need to be able to send the invite to the dynamically registered SIP user, however have it set the Target
URI and
To as the same contact number like below:
INVITE sip:61390009000@192.168.22.2:5061 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 202.0.155.73;rport;branch=z9hG4bKXeND9cHtgKF2j
Max-Forwards: 69
From: "0390001000" <sip:
0390001000@192.168.2.200>;tag=K4HHaZ9v1H07Q
To: <sip:61390009000@192.168.22.2:5061>
Is there a way to do this setting via variables? I can't seem to
find
any details for it.
Thanks
David
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org