Hi, have you checked your switch.conf.xml configuration for "sessions-per-second" value? <param name="sessions-per-second" value="30"/> Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Daniel Neubert On 28.07.2010 08:54, Durmuş Ali Öztürk wrote:
I will try to set up a fs system on CentOS, maybe the performance will be better.
I am sorry but I dont understand the difference between cps and number of active session.
If fs has 10 active sessions (with media), then the call per second should be 10 too??
2010/7/28 Phillip Jones-2 [via freeswitch-users] <[hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5345283&i=0>>
>> The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest source code
That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....
>> In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel 30 number?
In my (limited) experience there are two important things to control:
1) call per second 2) Total number of active sessions
Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on the CPU. So at 1 call per second I would be looking at your CPU utilization and if it is maxing out then reducing that rate.
My point being here that your box *may* be capable of handling 100 or 1000 sessions, if the cps is lowered.
HTH
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Durmuş Ali Öztürk <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=0>> wrote:
The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the latest source code?
In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while calling parallel 30 number? -- View this message in context: http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possibl... <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html?by-user=t&by-user=t> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=1>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org?by-user=t&by-user=t>
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=2> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org <http://www.freeswitch.org?by-user=t&by-user=t&by-user=t>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ View message @ http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possibl... <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5344088.html?by-user=t>
To unsubscribe from Re: 100 parallel calls not possible (Performance problems), click here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this message in context: Re: 100 parallel calls not possible (Performance problems) <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5345283.html> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/> at Nabble.com.