I'm talking more of an OS level security protocol... best practice guide. I'm sure we could make an effort to document these steps. /b On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:50 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote:
I personally think FreeSWITCH is already hardened enough - Only a fool or uninformed would allow the switch to be... well... left insecure in the first place.
We could harden FreeSWITCH by just simply re-writing the dialplan from scratch.
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org> wrote:
I know we have some BSD folks using it but not sure how well tested it is. I think we need to have a deployment protocol for a secure environment. You have to not only worry about the machines security but the toll fraud aspect and various other attacks that can originate in that manner.
/b
On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:26 PM, Mario Augusto Mania wrote:
Hi Brian, I am. I'm a brazilian developer and BSD oses user with focus in security.
m3
2012/2/18 Brian West <brian@freeswitch.org>
While sitting here in the hospital I have been talking to Philip Zimermann
(ZRTP) via phone... And we have talked about a FreeSWITCH hardening
project (NO JOKES PLEASE). This is taking FreeSWITCH and security to the
MAX. I would like to start this project to make FreeSWITCH more secure in
the long run. (not saying that its not secure now). Who would be
interested in such a project?
Thanks,
--
Brian West
FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC
Phone: +1 (918) 420-9266
Fax: +1 (918) 420-9267
brian@freeswitch.org
-- Brian West FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC Phone: +1 (918) 420-9266 Fax: +1 (918) 420-9267 brian@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitch.org
-- Brian West FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC Phone: +1 (918) 420-9266 Fax: +1 (918) 420-9267 brian@freeswitch.org http://www.freeswitch.org