Hi Fernando, Greetings from Rio..! It'd be interesting to understand more about these results - roughly speaking, two conferencing systems using the same codecs, etc., ought to perform pretty much identically, particularly with just a few callers. I'd be interested to see a network packet dump of a conference on each of the machines, if you're able to make one available. Cheers -- Dave
Hello freeswitchers!
I thought you're be pleased to know: FS beated Prosody S on subjective test on lay users. After 3 users testing the two conferences and reporting far better quality on FS, we decided to make a more rigorous test. Then we made a blind test by asking 4 lay users to dial two urls for 10 minutes from their x-lite and report the results. These users are non-techie and never heard about FS at all. The first url was Aculab Prosody S test app, then, a second call to FS on default conf (extension 3000). All users preferred FS. Some users were almost enthusiastic after entering FS conf. Some even started to blame ProsodyS after hearing FS. The average report told 50% more satisfaction on FS. Questions on report were simple ones, with results from 1(worse) to 5(best) : 1-Overall opinion(1-crap; 5-awesome); 2-Delay (1-more delay, 5-no delay at all); 3-Audio quality (1-noisy, choppy, etc; 5-cristal clear);
Machines used: Prosody S: Windows Vista Business, Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 @ 2.8 GHz, 4Gb de RAM FreeSwitch: CentOS 5.4, Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz, 1Gb RAM
Congratulations! You made a great product! -- Fernando Gregianin Testa Voice Technology Ltda +55 11 35882166
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org -- David Knell, Director, 3C Limited T: +44 20 3298 2000 E: dave@3c.co.uk W: http://www.3c.co.uk