Whats the old saying? Ignorance is bliss? Heh Just because and end user perceives it as being more secure doesn¹t make it so... Even faxing over voip you just tcpdump out the rtp and process it thru and you can recover then entire exchange... Same thing with a laptop, a sound card, and a wav recorder with a cheap passive phone tap... Only difference with legacy PSTN vs VoIP is its easier to hack a box somewhere along the way and intercept the traffic vs finding the trunk line carrying the traffic, however, it doesn¹t take long to figure out that there are tons of unsecure access points to the wire between your office and the CO... (even the fiber these days can be compromised relatively easily compared to what it was 10 years ago) My whole point here is I am not malicious when it comes to this sort of thing but I know what can be done and how cheap the technology to pull off these things really is. I smart but I am far from the smartest guy and if I can figure out how to do this stuff many people can figure it out... I¹m still say that the only secure computer is one fired into the sun on the tip of a rocket with no comms back to earth.. Then that¹s only secure until someone figures out how to retrieve it. K On 3/7/11 11:24 AM, "envelopes envelopes" <sunwood360@gmail.com> wrote:
From the perspective of end user, it is pretty easier to hacker an end user' inbox globally. However, you need physical presence to grab fax documents.
Interesting to see the view from IT people is so different from non-technical people. After, any existence has its reason.
On Mar 6, 2011 8:56 AM, "Ken Rice" <krice@freeswitch.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org