I thought that may be the case, which is why last week I wiped my dev box and started again :) Aggressive nat detection is in the internal.xml profile, as is apply- nat-acl. the relevent section of acl.conf.xml is: <list name="rfc1918" default="deny"> <node type="allow" cidr="10.0.0.0/8"/> <node type="allow" cidr="172.16.0.0/12"/> <node type="allow" cidr="192.168.0.0/16"/> </list> So it's all like it should be. What I can't figure out is how come FS manages to get the reply to one of the registers through to the right port but the second one goes completely wrong? Incidently if I map 5060 on the external IP through to port 5060 on the device's internal IP it works fine, but that's not quite the point :) Alex On 7 Jul 2008, at 15:10, Brian West wrote:
Looks like you're running some older configs..
Make sure you have these options on your sip profile:
<param name="apply-nat-acl" value="rfc1918"/> <param name="aggressive-nat-detection" value="true"/>
And the latest acl.conf.xml installed.
Rinse and repeat!
/b
On Jul 7, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Alex Kinch wrote:
Certainly.. Here's one I made earlier. Can do a more up to date and in depth one if you want more.
Brian West sip:brian@freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-users mailing list Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org