On Thu, 19 Sep 2013, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
installed to either /opt/freeswitch or /usr/local/freeswitch.
Linux FHS conformance (the 'world' I mostly live in), and recent Red Hat packaging practice would support the first; the second (/use/local) -- not so much Conspicuiously, the freeswitch packaging has not landed in Fedora or EPEL, which are sort of gateways for RH being interested in adding SELinux rulesets Some years ago at a SELinux presentation, I proposed at Ottawa Linux Symposium, and proposals have een floated from time to time to 'bundle' the SELinux rules for a given package within either the .spec file, or as some sort of 'mergable' location per package. Red Hat has chosen to go a different way, where there is a responsive maintainer (Dan Walsh) who seems to have more eyes than a peacock tail, as to SELinux issues on mailing lists Carrying local libraries rather than using system ones as much as possible, is another stumbling block to consider and address I've marked this for some more review after I get the FS SRPMS rebuilding locally -- Russ herrold