That's awesome! Links so we can follow progress? :-) Regards, João Mesquita On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jan Berger <jan.berger@video24.no> wrote:

Yes it’s for open source, but it’s a few hours away yet before I can use it for anything real.

Jan

------------------------------

*From:* freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] *On Behalf Of *João Mesquita *Sent:* 5. juni 2010 16:44 *To:* freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-dev] JavaScript - how bad is it?

I believe it has to do with how the language is constructed. Lua is built to be very lightweight.

Last time I checked, spidermonkey had some problems with delays on some very specific cases due to its inner workings, but I can't tell for sure.

Will you share your ccxml/vxml integration? I believe that these 2 components are something that lots of ppl could use.

JM

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jan Berger <jan.berger@video24.no> wrote:

Hi,

I know from a previous postings/discussions that the Javascript we use is considered to be bad – performance and memory wise. Can someone explain a little – who did the Javascript integration?

The reason I ask is because I am working on ccxml and vxml – and I need to add ECMAScript due to compatibility with external tools/libraries

.

The impression I get from wiki is that Lua perform 2 x the speed of JavaScript – does anyone know exactly why?

Jan

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org

_______________________________________________ FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org