Yes it’s for open source, but it’s a few hours away yet before I can use it for anything real.
Jan
From: freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-dev-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of João Mesquita
Sent: 5. juni 2010 16:44
To: freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-dev] JavaScript - how bad is it?
I believe it has to do with how the language is constructed. Lua is built to be very lightweight.
Last time I checked, spidermonkey had some problems with delays on some very specific cases due to its inner workings, but I can't tell for sure.
Will you share your ccxml/vxml integration? I believe that these 2 components are something that lots of ppl could use.
JM
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jan Berger <jan.berger@video24.no> wrote:
Hi,
I know from a previous postings/discussions that the Javascript we use is considered to be bad – performance and memory wise. Can someone explain a little – who did the Javascript integration?
The reason I ask is because I am working on ccxml and vxml – and I need to add ECMAScript due to compatibility with external tools/libraries
.
The impression I get from wiki is that Lua perform 2 x the speed of JavaScript – does anyone know exactly why?
Jan
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org
_______________________________________________
FreeSWITCH-dev mailing list
FreeSWITCH-dev@lists.freeswitch.org
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev
http://www.freeswitch.org