On Wed 11 Oct 2006 15:58, Anthony Minessale wrote:
Ok I'll try this one more time.
BEGIN --------------------------------------------------------- Quite simple,
When our build process gets to the module building stage, each module has it's own Makefile with targets to build it's own depends. it downloads the tarball with wget and configures it to the same target prefix as all of the others. The lines you pasted reflect that the directories in the install prefix and the cwd at build time contain the word "freeswitch" and does not imply much more than that.
snippit of our mod_sndfile's Makefile depends: MAKE=$(MAKE) $(BASE)/build/buildlib.sh $(BASE) install libsndfile-1.0.16.tar.gz --prefix=$(PREFIX) --disable-sqlite
Like I said we only host the exact tarball on our server, checksum it if you wish: http://svn.freeswitch.org/downloads/libs/libsndfile-1.0.16.tar.gz
Feel free to see for yourself if you still do not believe me. http://svn.freeswitch.org/svn/freeswitch/trunk http://svn.freeswitch.org/svn/freeswitch/trunk/src/mod/formats/mod_sndfile/
Your library is a welcome addition as a module to our software and we have had little trouble with it, thank you. If you would reccommend we use the newer version let me know: anthmct@yahoo.com
END ---------------------------------------------------------
Stuart, Since this is a mailing list I am going to talk to some other people to save time on mutiple emails, excuse me a minute:
Roman, Here is the downside to your suggestion, this guy is unhappy just because he *thinks* we keep his code in our tree.
This is not the only reason. As many of you know I have been a fairly vocol opponent of including external libraries into FreeSWITCH (and other projects) for a while. In the end most users will simply use the rpms provided on the website or by their distro so providing packages and helping out distro packagers is a much better use of time in my opinion. Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc