Hi Kristian, What you are doing now looks very elementary, and there is no real reason to use ecasound. I don't know what you intend to do as you flesh out this quality assessment, but its not clear to me where ecasound would ever be a big benefit in such a tool. Not using ecasound certainly simplifies its licencing issues. :-) Regards, Steve Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
William,
That's what I do now and it's somewhat clunky.
There is one advantage: you can continually tweak ecasound params to look for other audio issues and reprocess the files. Other than that it seems like a module is the way to go.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:35 AM, William Suffill <william.suffill@gmail.com> wrote:
Well placing calls and analyzing the results after the fact would avoid any licensing issues. As long as you have recordings that could be processed the concept should still work.
- W
PS: Yes haven't had any coffee yet so might me out of my mind =)
_______________________________________________ Freeswitch-dev mailing list Freeswitch-dev@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-dev UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-dev http://www.freeswitch.org