[Freeswitch-users] Ringless Voicemail

[Mike Jerris]

This is all correct. In practice what you will “usually” see is an almost immediate missed call indication on the phone (and in my testing my phone rarely made a ring sound at all) as that first call is hung up very quickly… usually… except when it doesn’t happen like that… which you have no control over...


> On Mar 31, 2021, at 8:13 AM, Guillermo Ruiz Camauer <grcamauer at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Vishal,
> 
> If you use one line to make the line busy you are taking the "Ringless" out of it...  I doubt the end user will appreciate that first call.
> I believe that true Ringless voicemail involves APIs with the carriers that allow the messages to be inserted directly into the voicemail systems.
> Those APIs are accessed only by "partner"companies (companies with which they have signed agreements).  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Guillermo
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:43 AM Vishal Pai <vishalmpai at gmail.com <mailto:vishalmpai at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello Everyone
> 
> These days lots of companies use/provide solutions for Ringless voicemail. Also I found one url stating the RVM using freeswitch.
> 
> https://www.edoceo.com/dev/call-to-voicemail <https://www.edoceo.com/dev/call-to-voicemail>
> 
> Can we use freeswitch for it. or it is provided by the carrier/gateway to drop messages directly in the VM bypass ring.
> 
> In the above URL if we refer then 2 calls are being made to make 1 line busy and second to drop vim.
> 
> 
> Last question: Is it being legal nowadays?
> 
> Thanks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20210331/0e0e59de/attachment.html>