[Freeswitch-users] Why two ilbc(ilbc2) RPMs in CentOS 7 repos

[Michael Jerris]

ilbc2 is the right one, configure checks for both, it is to avoid the name
collision.  not sure why they would
both be there, ilbc probably shouldn't be.

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 9:27 AM Richard Chan <richard at treeboxsolutions.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what the purpose is of having two RPMs for ilbc, named
> ilbc and ilbc2.
>
> Does the build system check for both? In Fedora (not sure for CentOS)
>  there is an incompatible RPM so perhaps to avoid a package name clash?
>
> --
> Richard Chan
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20170511/b7860e1b/attachment.html