[Freeswitch-users] Disable picture_fast_update INFO requests

[Fabio Margarido]

Yeah, sometimes it's a pain to get things to work with SIP in the browser.

I've created improvement FS-8964 for this.

Thanks

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:37 AM Anthony Minessale <
anthony.minessale at gmail.com> wrote:

> Probably if it actually sent a key frame when onr was desired.
>
> We could pribably make a param to disable it.  Or disable it on sip+webrtc
> though I still don't get why that is even a thing.  Webrtc hates sip, their
> very core goal is to eliminaye it.
>
> Yes we support the rtcp way.
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 18, 2016, Fabio Margarido <fabiomargarido at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've now managed to get both sides to send a 200 OK response to the INFO
>> request, but FreeSWITCH keeps sending them at a rate of more than one per
>> second.
>>
>> Is this expected behavior?
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 3:41 PM Fabio Margarido <fabiomargarido at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone?
>>>
>>> From what I understood reading other discussions regarding this request
>>> on the list, this is an obsolete way of requesting a picture refresh and
>>> that the ideal way would be via RTCP. Does FreeSWITCH support both? If
>>> that's the case, shouldn't there be a flag which allows to choose which
>>> method to use?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:01 PM Fabio Margarido <fabiomargarido at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi there.
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying a scenario in which FreeSWITCH sits between a WebRTC
>>>> endpoint and an IMS network, performing media conversion.
>>>>
>>>> When a call is established, FS starts to send INFO requests with an
>>>> application/media_control+xml body related to RFC 5168. The WebRTC endpoint
>>>> always responds with 415 Unsupported Media Type (the web application uses
>>>> sip.js) and the IMS network sometimes responds with 500 Server Internal
>>>> Error. The problem I have is that FS sends that request every second to
>>>> both sides and keeps doing so for as long as the call is answered.
>>>>
>>>> My question is whether it would stop or at least scale down the
>>>> frequency if both sides replied with 200 OK, or alternatively if there is a
>>>> way to disable the sending of these requests. I've looked at the
>>>> documentation and the mailing list history but couldn't find anything
>>>> conclusive.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Anthony Minessale II       ♬ @anthmfs  ♬ @FreeSWITCH  ♬
>
> ☞ http://freeswitch.org/  ☞ http://cluecon.com/  ☞
> http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH
> ☞ irc.freenode.net #freeswitch ☞ *http://freeswitch.org/g+
> <http://freeswitch.org/g+>*
>
> ClueCon Weekly Development Call
> ☎ sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org  ☎ +19193869900
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XXgW34t40s
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLaDpGQuZDA
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160321/d6960b5a/attachment.html