[Freeswitch-users] NDLB for SIP INFO

[Michael Jerris]

Feel free to create a patch and submit it and we would be happy to review it.

> On Oct 22, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Chris B. Ware <chrisbware at yahoo.it> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michale,
> 
> - I use SIP INFO since I need to bypass media (no RTP stream for local calls).
> - I reported it to both vendors. Gigaset say they are compliant with many PBX vendors, so they don't need to change it. Yealink should answer soon. 
> 
> Anyway Gigaset IP Cordless are good and cheap, so many customers would like to use them, that's why I'm asking the patch.
> 
> Thank you. 
> 
> 
> >I don't think it exists.  It might be possible to add one and we would
> >probably review that patch, but why wouldn't you just use rfc2833 instead
> >and/or report this error to the vendors?
> >
> >>On Thursday, October 22, 2015, Chris B. Ware <chrisbware at yahoo.it <http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users>> wrote:
> 
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I've discovered that Gigatset and Yealink IP cordless send SIP INFO in a
> >> wrong way, according to SDP RFC.
> >> If I press 4, I get on SDP
> >>
> >> Signal=4\r\n
> >> Duration=100
> >>
> >> While should be
> >>
> >> Signal=4\r\n
> >> Duration=100\r\n
> >>
> >>
> >> Freeswitch (1.4.23) answers with 400 Bad Request. I wonder if there's
> >> something like a NDLB params to accept this format, based on SDP Content
> >> Length.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thank you
> >>
> >>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20151022/f956fc0e/attachment-0001.html