[Freeswitch-users] Polycom headache

Moishe Grunstein max at nysolutions.com
Tue Mar 24 20:49:44 MSK 2015


We are on various 4 and 5 revisions and it works.

Thanks,

Moishe Grunstein
Tornado Computer Systems, Inc.
212.400.7650 888.IPPBX.US
Service Request Email: support at nysolutions.com<mailto:support at nysolutions.com>
[cid:image001.jpg at 01C72F94.9EE45D60]<http://www.nysolutions.com/>
Computer Networking * Managed Services * IP Video Surveillance * Network Assessments * Web Solutions * Voice over IP * Disaster Recovery * Network Security * Site Surveys * CMS

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of João Mesquita
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:15 PM
To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Polycom headache

They are all IP331 and IP550 on firmware 4.0.8 (latest). I am giving Spencer's suggestion for a spin and will report back ASAP.

Thanks Spencer!

João Mesquita
FreeSWITCH™ Solutions

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com<mailto:mike at jerris.com>> wrote:
which phone models?  what firmware are they on?


On Mar 24, 2015, at 12:27 PM, João Mesquita <jmesquita at freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita at freeswitch.org>> wrote:

Moishe, what UC software version are you using?

MikeJ, I've set this on the web interface as well as provisioning and it's like it doesn't care, it will send 0.0.0.0 anyway. Knowing a firmware version that will make this work would be awesome.

João Mesquita
FreeSWITCH™ Solutions

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com<mailto:mike at jerris.com>> wrote:
Brian found this in the admin guide:

Enable Call Hold Parameter Function
Specify whether to use RFC 2543 (c=0.0.0.0) or RFC 3264 (a=sendonly or a=inactive) for outgoing hold signaling.
Specify whether to use sendonly hold signaling. Configure local call hold reminder options. Specify the music-on-hold URI.
Example Call Hold Configuration
template > parameter
sip-interop.cfg > voIpProt.SIP.useRFC2543hold
sip-interop.cfg > voIpProt.SIP.useSendonlyHold sip-interop.cfg > call.hold.localReminder.* sip-interop.cfg > voIpProt.SIP.musicOnHold.uri

On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:25 AM, João Mesquita <jmesquita at freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita at freeswitch.org>> wrote:

I am deeply sorry, I've hit send too early. Damn Gmail...

Guys, I am sure most of you have been through this but this is my first time. I am having a HOLD problem with Polycom where they refuse to work according to the "new" RFC3624 using SDP a attributes (sendonly/recvonly) to indicate hold and keep sending 0.0.0.0 as the old RFC2543. I guess this is a known thing since I've found several hits on Google about it and they even created an option for it on their provisioning material. Unfortunately, it doesn't work. No matter what I set on the voIpProt.SIP.useRFC2543hold option, it still sends 0.0.0.0 as follows:

v=0
o=- 1167669703 1167669704 IN IP4 0.0.0.0
s=Polycom IP Phone
c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0
t=0 0
m=audio 2228 RTP/AVP 8 101
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000

I've also looked into FS code and I've found something on the lines of, but this is not kicking in either (granted, I am using 1.4.14 still and I really don't believe FS should cope with this crap either).

if ((sdp->sdp_connection && sdp->sdp_connection->c_address && !strcmp(sdp->sdp_connection->c_address, "0.0.0.0"))) {
switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_SESSION_LOG(session), SWITCH_LOG_WARNING, "RFC2543 from March 1999 called; They want their 0.0.0.0 hold method back.....\n");
sendonly = 2; /* global sendonly always wins */
}

So, why am I coming to this ML for help? I wanted to know how did you guys figure this out, is there an exact firmware version where Polycom has this figured out or is it one of those long lasting ones that Polycom never cares to address?

And btw, I tried with UC software version 4.0.8 and 4.0.7.

Thank you,
João Mesquita

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:19 PM, João Mesquita <jmesquita at freeswitch.org<mailto:jmesquita at freeswitch.org>> wrote:

Guys, I am sure most of you have been through this but this is my first time. I am having a HOLD problem with Polycom where they refuse to work according to the "new" RFC3624 using SDP a attributes (sendonly/recvonly) to indicate hold and keep sending 0.0.0.0 as the old RFC2543. I guess this is a known thing since I've found several hits on Google about it and they even created an option for it on their provisioning material. Unfortunately, it doesn't work. No matter what I set on the

<pre>
if ((sdp->sdp_connection && sdp->sdp_connection->c_address && !strcmp(sdp->sdp_connection->c_address, "0.0.0.0"))) {
switch_log_printf(SWITCH_CHANNEL_SESSION_LOG(session), SWITCH_LOG_WARNING, "RFC2543 from March 1999 called; They want their 0.0.0.0 hold method back.....\n");
sendonly = 2; /* global sendonly always wins */
}
João Mesquita


_________________________________________________________________________
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
consulting at freeswitch.org<mailto:consulting at freeswitch.org>
http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com

Official FreeSWITCH Sites
http://www.freeswitch.org
http://confluence.freeswitch.org
http://www.cluecon.com

FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org<mailto:FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org>
http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150324/065afee8/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2424 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150324/065afee8/attachment-0001.jpg 


Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list