[Freeswitch-users] sched_hangup update within active call

[Stanislav Sinyagin]

Kamil, I just looked now at the sources explicitly. sched_hangup does
not check if there's another hangup task already present. It just adds
a new hangup task.

So, if the second sched_hangup assigns an event that is nearer in
time, then yes, it will be executed earlier. But if you try using
sched_hangup to extend the call time, it will not work.



On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Kamil Nigmatullin
<kamil.nigmatullin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2015-06-10 13:46 GMT+06:00 Vlad Fabi <vaad.fabi at gmail.com>:
>>
>> ly scheduler application at external side, that controls active c
>
>
> Not sure 100% but if you connect to FS via ESL (Inbound) you can reschedule
> call by its  uuid using the same sched_hangup application. I don't remember
> what starting point of this timeout should be used but it worked when I
> implemented multichannel prepaid. At the moment, I don't have access to the
> server where it works but can look at some time later.
>
>
> --
> Kamil Nigmatullin
> mob: 7 (707) 2517003
> Skype: kamil.nigmatullin
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org