[Freeswitch-users] glibc GHOST vulnerability

[Michael Jerris]

It was already correctly confirmed in this thread.
> On Jan 31, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Regis M <regis.freeswitch.org at tornad.net> wrote:
> 
> It's not paranoid, it's a logic and normal question.
> 
> For me, but as to be confirmed by freeswitch dev and c expert, FS compile with linked library by default. And doing :
> $ ldd <path_to_fs>/bin/freeswitch 
> show you the linked librairy with your binary on your system.
> 
> If someone else can confirm my post too, I'm not 100% sure.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 2015-01-30 21:01 GMT+01:00 Oleg Stolyar <olegstolyar at gmail.com <mailto:olegstolyar at gmail.com>>:
> Yep, just being paranoid and want to absolutely confirm that the standard FreeSWITCH build links libraries (including glibc) dynamically.
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 30, 2015 11:39 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org <mailto:sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org>> wrote:
> There is no need to rebuild an application linked against a dynamic library.
> 
> On Friday 30 January 2015 11:30:28 Oleg Stolyar wrote:
> > Sorry if the question is naive - trying to be paranoid here.
> >
> > On my CentOS machines I updated my glibc version to one that fixed the
> > GHOST vulnerability.
> >
> > Do I need to rebuild FS or is the library linked dynamically, so there is
> > no need to rebuild?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20150203/52d806a4/attachment-0001.html