[Freeswitch-users] Re- Freetdm version inside FreeSWITCH

[Vallimamod Abdullah]

Hi,

I have the same issue as Andrew with ftmod_sangoma_ss7: the last commit from sangoma is from May 1st, 2014. So that would be great!

Thank you,
Vallimamod
.


> On 01 Apr 2015, at 22:34, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:
> 
> Sangoma has direct commit access to our tree to commit these changes.  In the past they pushed the changes directly in on a regular basis, you would have to ask them in what way they have changed this approach.
> 
> 
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Andrew Keil <andrew.keil at visytel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> To FreeSWITCH users,
>>  
>> I am not sure if this should be posted inside the developers mailing list, however I thought I would start here first.
>>  
>> Currently I am setting up a FreeSWITCH system (using the current production release version) in the UK which will be running off BT (British Telecom) and use both SIP and ISDN30e. 
>>  
>> The ISDN side will use Sangoma A104DE cards (which I have just purchased and I am testing currently).
>>  
>> Now the fun begins…
>>  
>> I came across an Open Circuit alarm issue, which Sangoma are investigating, which then caused an unmapped debug message to happen (correctly from inside FreeSWITCH ftmod_wanpipe.c).
>>  
>> Sangoma then suggested I run: ftp://ftp.sangoma.com/linux/custom/freetdm/freetdm-1.9.0.tar.gz
>>  
>> {since this has a temporary fix to skip open circuit alarms and let FreeSWITCH continue to run with no DEBUG messages, also it adds a header (ftmod_wanpipe_defines.h) to enable mapping of alarm status values to plain English – instead of the current unmapped message}
>>  
>> Which brings me to my primary question:
>>  
>> Sangoma have advised me that they manage freetdm and I should use their version.  However when I look at the source to ftmod_wanpipe.c (for example) their version (freetdm-1.9.0) has the following header: Copyright (c) 2007-2012, Anthony Minessale II vs. FreeSWITCH current version: Copyright (c) 2007-2014, Anthony Minessale II.  Obviously there are other additions/changes done by Sangoma (including the Open Circuit alarm skipping).
>>  
>> So what is FreeSWITCH’s point of view on this?  Do you merge the changes every <x> months from Sangoma’s freetdm or simply expect the freetdm component to be overwritten by Sangoma’s current version prior to FreeSWITCH being built?
>>  
>> My main aim is to have a reasonably well supported system and not come across issues that have already been found and fixed by either Sangoma or FreeSWITCH.
>>  
>> Thanks in advance for any feedback on this, as I just want to make sure I am using an agreed best version of freetdm.
>>  
>> Andrew Keil
>> Visytel Pty Ltd