[Freeswitch-users] TLS with Yealink and Fanvil phones

[Brian West]

Did you happen to ask them if their bong water was stagnate?  REALLY? CRLFCRLF?  sigh

You can bet if Polycom works its ok, if Fanvil doesn’t they are obviously on something that they should share with the class.

Words actually fail me on this one… and thats rare.

--
Brian West
brian at freeswitch.org
FreeSWITCH Solutions, LLC
PO BOX 2531
Brookfield, WI 53008-2531
Twitter: @FreeSWITCH , @briankwest
http://www.freeswitchbook.com
http://www.freeswitchcookbook.com

T: +1.918.420.9001  |  F: +1.918.420.9002  |  M: +1.918.424.WEST
iNUM: +883 5100 1420 9001
ISN: 410*543
Skype:briankwest
PGP Key: http://www.bkw.org/key.txt (AB93356707C76CED)













On Mar 6, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Yehavi Bourvine <yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
>   As a part of a tender for IP phones I am testing TLS with various phones against FS v 1.2.17.
> 
> SNOM and Poylcom works ok. Yealink did not, but they got enough debug information to create a fix.
> 
> Fanvil claims that the SIPS packet generated by FS does not end with CRLFCRLF, thus they fail parsing it, and ask me to add this suffix.
> 
> Who is right? FS or Fanvil? I can browse the sources and try to add this to see whether it helps, but I have no idea what it might break...
> 
>                   Thanks, __Yehavi:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140306/805b2c5e/attachment.bin