[Freeswitch-users] Will sqllite on a ramdisk be more performant than postgres with the db on a ramdisk?

[Anthony Minessale]

The sqlite way would be the fastest head to head especially if none of the
data is critical.



On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Clinton Goudie-Nice <cgoudie at getjive.com>wrote:

> I've got a piece of tech that I'm working on where I don't really need to
> worry all that much about recreating the FS DB on a reboot.
>
> With that in mind, I'm thinking about one of two options:
> 1) Sqllite on a ramdisk.
> 2) Postgres with the db for FS placed on a ramdisk.
>
> What do you think I will get higher performance out of?
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>


-- 
Anthony Minessale II       ♬ @anthmfs  ♬ @FreeSWITCH  ♬

☞ http://freeswitch.org/  ☞ http://cluecon.com/  ☞
http://twitter.com/FreeSWITCH
☞ irc.freenode.net #freeswitch ☞ *http://freeswitch.org/g+
<http://freeswitch.org/g+>*

ClueCon Weekly Development Call
☎ sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org  ☎ +19193869900
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20140127/428072e3/attachment.html