[Freeswitch-users] Passing the original caller-id after a call is transferred

[Avi Marcus]

An attended / supervised transfer should always show 1002 -- he's
initiating a call to 1003, e.g. the secretary calls him and asks if he
should transfer the call. Are you sure you'd really want to show the caller
ID of 1001 in this case?

If you are doing a blind transfer, however, then that's right, you would
want the CID of 1001 to show.
Are you sure it's not?

Can you provide an FS log (and/or a PCAP) of both attended and unattended
transfer to show this issue?

You can paste to http://pastebin.freeswitch.org

-Avi Marcus
BestFone

On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Ravi K <ravik0568 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I am using Freeswitch with Cisco phones(mode 303) and have the following
> setup:
>
> User 1001 is calling user 1002, user 1002 does a blind/supervised transfer
> to 1003, but user 1003 see the caller-id of 1002. I am trying to get the
> caller-id of 1001 on 1003.
>
> I have gone through the earlier posts related to this topic and tried the
> following suggestions:
>
> 1. <action application="set"  data="ignore_display_updates=true"/>
>
> I configured this before bridging the call, but did not work.
>
> 2. <param name="caller-id-in-from" value="true"/>
>
> and set <action inline="true" application="export"
> data="effective_caller_id_number=${caller_id_number}"
> but this did not work either
>
> 3. I see a message from Anthony: "use set_profile_var on the inbound leg
> to set caller_id_name". What variable do I assign to caller_id_name.
>
> I am new to FS and most surely asking a dumb question. So I greatly
> appreciate if any helpful souls can point me in the right direction. I will
> update the wiki for sure.
>
> Thanks
> Ravi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130212/3f5cabf8/attachment.html