[Freeswitch-users] ACL Behaviour

[Steven Ayre]

Without shouting file a jira... if that is intended behaviour a jira ticket
could be commented and closed as such, and refered to from any duplicate
tickets later. Or corrected.



On Wednesday, August 21, 2013, Andrew Cassidy wrote:

> Hi all, I've just noticed a slightly unexpected (in my view) behavior when
> checking ACLs.
>
> If you have an empty ACL with default="allow" it will always return false.
> Of course the workaround is to add a nonsense node into the list such as
> 0.0.0.0/32 (either allow or deny) then the ACL works as expected.
>
> Now, before people shout FILE A JIRA at me, the reason I haven't is
> because this behavior may be intended to prevent users accidentally leaving
> their FreeSWITCH installations open.
>
> So my question is, is this the intended behaviour? If so, I'll add it to
> the wiki.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> *Andrew Cassidy BSc (Hons) MBCS SSCA*
> Managing Director
>
>
> *T <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'info at cassidywebservices.co.uk');> *03300
> 100 960  *F <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'info at cassidywebservices.co.uk');>
> *03300 100 961
> *E <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'info at cassidywebservices.co.uk');> *
> andrew at cassidywebservices.co.uk <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'andrew at cassidywebservices.co.uk');>
> *W <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'info at cassidywebservices.co.uk');> *
> www.cassidywebservices.co.uk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20130821/5fbc581a/attachment.html