[Freeswitch-users] Some questions from a relative newbie

[Stanislav Sinyagin]

in this case, you would have two OpenSIPS boxes and two FreeSwitch boxes. The easiest scenario would be to run them in 
active/standby mode, so that only one box is handling the calls, and the other one starts acting only when it realizes that the master box is 
gone.
Here is one of possible examples:
http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deployment_OpenSIPS

There are also some scenarios for active/active redundancy, but that requires much more engineering efforts.




>________________________________
> From: D'Arcy Cain <darcy at Vex.Net>
>To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org> 
>Cc: Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin at yahoo.com> 
>Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:07 PM
>Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Some questions from a relative newbie
> 
>On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
>Stanislav Sinyagin <ssinyagin at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> by the way, do you consider running a fault-tolerant service with
>> OpenSIPS/Kamailio/Repro as a border controller and two FreeSWITCH boxes
>> behind?
>
>Thanks.  I have added that to my reading list.  However, I am not sure
>how useful that scenario would be.  Doesn't the OpenSIPS router just
>become my new point of failure?  If I add another box I can get my
>provider to fail over to it.  That makes them the point of failure but
>they already are so I kind of depend on them not to go down anyway.
>
>-- 
>D'Arcy J.M. Cain
>System Administrator, Vex.Net
>http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:darcy at Vex.Net
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120923/101f0a2e/attachment.html