[Freeswitch-users] Performance Testing

[Hanie Maghsoudy]

Thanks Peter, I will definitely test with a real server too. But, first of
all, I'm really interested to know that what the result looks like for the
others (perhaps with real servers in real environment).

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Peter Olsson <
peter.olsson at visionutveckling.se> wrote:

> Before trying anything else, use real hardware instead of virtual. A
> virtual server with this kind of load will only cause you trouble. Actually
> - most virtual solutions will cause you problems :)
>
> Also, performance with average call duration of 4s is not really anything
> that would happen in real life.
>
> But first of all - get real hardware.
>
> /Peter
>
> ________________________________
> Från: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org [
> freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] för Hanie Maghsoudy [
> h.maghsoudy at gmail.com]
> Skickat: den 7 juli 2012 09:46
> Till: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] Performance Testing
>
> Hi all,
>
> I searched for FreeSwitch call capacity, but most of the results wasn't
> new. So, I wanna ask if anybody has either tested FreeSwitch's performance
> recently, or got a dramatic result in real environment?
>
> I tested call quality on this machine:
>
> Virtual FreeSwitch server
> OS: CentOS release 6.2 - x86_64
> CPU: 8 processor - Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670  @ 2.93GHz
> Memory: 8 G
>
> After receiving incoming calls, FreeSwitch routed them to another sip
> server, without transcoding. The other server transmitted calls by playing
> an audio file.  Meanwhile, I called an extension in FreeSwitch to test the
> call quality.
>
> The result was like this:
>
> 1000 Concurrent calls
> Call duration: 160s
> Call rate: 6 cps (just creating channels)
> Max used Memory: 1416M
> Max CPU load: 0.24
> Max Network throughput (recv/send): 6711k/80k
> Quality: Good
>
> This test was taken before tearing down the channels.
>
> Then, I took another test to estimate calls per second, and it wasn't what
> I was expected!
>
>
> 150 Concurrent calls
> Call duration: 4s
> Call rate: 30 cps (creating and tearing down)
> Max used Memory: 1293M
> Max CPU load: 4.50
> Max Network throughput (recv/send): 828k/60k
> Quality: Average
>
> And when I increase call rate to 50 cps:
>
> 1000 Concurrent calls
> Call duration: 4s
> Call rate: 50 cps (creating and tearing down)
> Max used Memory: 1730M
> Max CPU load: 29.9
> Max Network throughput (recv/send): 1367k/202k
> Quality: Bad
>
> Why call per second is such a big problem? Did anyone get a better result
> on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Hanie
>
> !DSPAM:4ff7e86232761844718139!
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> Join Us At ClueCon - Aug 7-9, 2012
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20120707/7992d5b3/attachment.html