[Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

[Peder]

Are these users SIP, or thru an analog line, or?  I assumed they were both
SIP, but based on your comments about on-hook and off-hook, I am thinking
maybe analog for one.  No, I am not on IRC.  Lots of other people are
though.

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Leck
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:50 AM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

Hi Peder, 

 

Thanks again for your swift reply. FS is running on a Public IP address. The
UA is also running on a Public IP address. Yes, I did used wireshark to do a
sip trace on FS and see that the bye was not present. 

 

One reason I could think of could be the on-hook and off-hook time interval
or frequency for off-net calling is different that's why it could not hang
up? Or what else could be affecting.

 

Thanks in advanced for helping me out and I look forward to reply. 

 

Btw, are you on IRC and if you are can I chat with you?

 

Many thanks 

Simon Leck

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Peder
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:42 PM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

Public IP on what?  The phone, or FS?  Did you do a packet capture at the FS
box, or at the phone?  If you did it at the phone, it still doesn't prove
that FS didn't send a bye.

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Leck
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:47 PM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

Hi Pedar, 

 

Thanks for your reply. At first I thought it was NAT issue so to isolate the
problem I used a Public IP but I still get the same result? I have used
wireshark to do a trace but I don't see FS sending a bye to A?

 

Kindly advice me on how else could I solved this issue. On the NAT Part, I
have enable RTP keep alive as well. Under RTCP, I have the keep alive turned
on as well?

 

Which other place are there setting I can configure with?

 

Thanks in advanced Pedar for your kindest help

 

Many thanks

Simon Leck

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Peder
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:57 AM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

It should happen automatically.  Is A behind NAT?  Sounds like a
firewall/NAT may be dropping the bye.  Also, have you done a debug on FS to
see if it actually sends a bye or not to A?

 

From: freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org
[mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces at lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Simon
Leck
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:42 AM
To: 'FreeSWITCH Users Help'
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] - freeswitch bye issue

 

Hi Everyone, kindly help if you can 

 

At the moment I did encounter a issue, A leg user called a b leg user and
when b leg user hanged up (Bye is not send by freeswitch to the A leg user)
the only way I could hanged up this call  to hanged up the A leg user
manually? Would be great if someone could enlighten me on how this can be
achieved?

 

Thanks in advanced to anyone for helping me out

 

Thanks again

Simon Leck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110907/311597d1/attachment.html