[Freeswitch-users] OpenSER interface to FreeSWITCH

[Michael Collins]

I doubt you'd want to do this - you'd be adding yet another layer of
complexity. I suppose the only benefit is that having a proxy (OpenSER) in
front of FreeSWITCH means you could have multiple FS servers for redundancy.
In your case, though, I don't know how valuable that is.

Can you remind us again of what you're building? I think we're all having a
hard time understanding why you need so many pieces. If you could draw the
audio and signaling paths as well that would really help us understand.

-MC

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jason b.a <k-b-24 at live.com> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> is it possible to implements is an interface to OpenSER over a TCP
> connection, so the design will be :
>
> Caller----IVR application----OpenSER-----Freeswitch
>                    |
>                    |
>                Callee
>
> without the need to use the Sip sophia module, only openSER control the
> freeswitch for media processing using the socket interface.
>
> Thx
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110222/1e7ce24f/attachment.html