I doubt you'd want to do this - you'd be adding yet another layer of complexity. I suppose the only benefit is that having a proxy (OpenSER) in front of FreeSWITCH means you could have multiple FS servers for redundancy. In your case, though, I don't know how valuable that is.<div>
<br></div><div>Can you remind us again of what you're building? I think we're all having a hard time understanding why you need so many pieces. If you could draw the audio and signaling paths as well that would really help us understand.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-MC<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jason b.a <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:k-b-24@live.com">k-b-24@live.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>
Hi,<br>
<br>
is it possible to implements is an interface to OpenSER over a TCP connection, so the design will be : <br>
<br>
Caller----IVR application----OpenSER-----Freeswitch<br>
|<br>
|<br>
Callee<br>
<br>
without the need to use the Sip sophia module, only openSER control the freeswitch for media processing using the socket interface.<br>
<br>
Thx <br> </div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>