[Freeswitch-users] H.323 implementation on FS
Gustavo Espeche
gustavo.espeche at upper-soft.com
Sat Feb 5 01:09:06 MSK 2011
Use Yate we are try to use mod_opal or mod_h323 in production with-out
success, Yate has lot of issue but is a good inter-worker between h323
and sip.
Freeswitch has a lost of good think but the inter-worker isn't it.
Because of then we use Freeswitch for billing propose but Yate for
inter-worker.
But if you need use FS for inter-worker use mod_h323 is a little more
stable.
Best Regards.
Gustavo Espeche
www.easyipcall.com
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 19:20 +0000, Steven Ayre wrote:
> Although there's almost no H323 traffic - we're almost entirely SIP -
> so I can't say how stable it is for a large load.
>
> -Steve
>
>
> On 4 February 2011 19:20, Steven Ayre <steveayre at gmail.com> wrote:
> I had problems with mod_opal but mod_h323 works for me.
>
> -Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4 February 2011 12:55, Vedran Zeljeznak
> <vedran.zeljeznak at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi everyone,
>
> do any of you have any suggestions which H.323
> implementation
> (mod_opal or mod_h323) should be used on a production
> Freeswitch
> platform (HEAD version)?
>
> Is it better to forward calls from H.323 trunk through
> Yate
> (configured as H.323 to SIP proxy) before terminating
> them on
> Freeswitch?
>
> ---
> Vedran Zeljeznak
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
>
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list