[Freeswitch-users] Auto test FS install - now necessary?

jesse chat2jesse at gmail.com
Fri Feb 4 19:34:33 MSK 2011


I do not see any piece of unit testing code neither.
Reliability is more important than feature. Asterisk is a good example of
such case.

I would recommend developers take a pause to add unit testing cases and auto
integration testings.  Also enforce any future code must be accompanied by
unit testing code.
On Feb 3, 2011 9:47 PM, "Avi Marcus" <avi at avimarcus.net> wrote:
> Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but I've been seeing a lot of "I just
updated
> to latest git and X broke"
> And that x is always something else...
> I'm not a seasoned coder on this magnitude, but perhaps we can develop a
> test suite (at least part of one) to test that a fresh install is
> functioning?
> A FULL test would probably be a huge undertaking and involve recqual for
> testing media, too... Also, each mod would need to have it's own test
suite.
> Due to the rapid updating of FreeSWITCH this not be what you want to put
> your effort into, but...
> Thoughts?
> On Feb 4, 2011 4:04 AM, "Anirudha Shimpi" <anu at familytv.com> wrote:
>> Just downloaded (from git) and installed FS 1.0.7, however, every time I
> do
>> originate user/1001 &park, FS crashes. Running Centos 5.5 64 bit.
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20110204/c1f50b1f/attachment.html 


More information about the FreeSWITCH-users mailing list