[Freeswitch-users] Asterisk and Freeswitch on the same machine!

[Avi Marcus]

1) Sangoma cards with an SS7 stack for FS, a much less hacky solution..
2) Does your server end up transcoding? Is that why it's using so much cpu?

-Avi


On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Anita Hall <anita.hall at simmortel.com>wrote:

> Hi friends
>
> Since my efforts to find an open source solution for SS7 on freeswitch did
> not meet any success, we had to resort to a cheap trick!
>
> chan_ss7 <-> Asterisk <-> FreeSWITCH
>
> where * and FS are on the same machine.
>
> Since we wanted to do only 120 calls per machine, it has worked out pretty
> well. Doing more than 150 calls is meeting a CPU bottleneck (surprisingly
> from FS side!)
>
> One interesting thing, we noted was that FS was taking considerably more
> CPU cycles than Asterisk (sometimes thrice as much!) when the calls were
> sent from Asterisk to FS. The dialplan on Asterisk was playing gsm audio
> (demo context) while FS dialplan was just sleeping! I believe, this is
> surprising?
>
> When doing SIP calls from FS to Asterisk, the CPU loads are comparable. I
> was under the impression that FS take less CPU cycles?
>
> My team member is writing a report with all performance stats, shall share
> when it is done.
>
> Bye,
> Anita.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> 
> 
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://wiki.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20111229/fe9e8392/attachment-0001.html