[Freeswitch-users] Optimal configuration for compiling on 64-bit platforms

[Giovanni Maruzzelli]

Compiler options have nothing to do with libraries incompatibilities.
Why don't you use the standard libraries given by your distro?
Never heard someone had to compile ssl libs for FreeSWITCH.
Also never heard someone used any compiler options on standard machines.
FS is targeted toward 64bit OSes, most people use CentOS, Ubuntu and
Debian. CentOS is by far the most used and the reference platform. On
64bit.
That said, if you're trying to optimize it for a PIII, an EPIA 5000 or
an ARM, or whatever is not a standard server class machine, yes you
better know how to optimize :).

On 4/10/11, A E [Gmail] <all.eforums at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:41 PM, curriegrad2004
> <curriegrad2004 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> It seems for me on a PIII under SL6/Fedora 12-13 that the
>> auto-optmization doesn't happen at all
>>
>>
> Well, I tried  the simple straight-forward
>
> ./bootstrap.sh && ./configure && make but got a WHOLE bunch of other errors,
> which look much worse than the ones I got with compiling with the switches
> forcing 64-bit build.
>
> Looks like my only solution here might be to download source of openssl and
> compile it on this machine and see if that gets accepted :(
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

Sincerely,

Giovanni Maruzzelli
Cell : +39-347-2665618