[Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session

[Michael Collins]

LIke bkw and anthm said, at fs_cli:

conference <conf_name> record <file_name>

Problem solved, no?

-MC

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Rob Morin <rmorin at blie-ent.com> wrote:

> Requiring 2*n g729 licenses because of the way it is built into the
> conference is exactly the point. I'm wondering, is there legally a way to
> alter the implementation such that n+1 is the proper number of licenses?
> Would creating a "phantom channel" for the recording achieve that?
>
> Just a thought,
> Rob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian West [mailto:brian at freeswitch.org]
> Sent: 09/29/2010 5:27 PM
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session
>
> You know recording is built into the conference itself.
>
> /b
>
> On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Rob Morin wrote:
>
> > Two items, one for John, and one for the community:
> >
> > 1. Did you (John) ever get this working?
> >
> > 2. There has been discussion that if the calls are g729, that 2*n
> > licenses are required (where n is the number of legs on a conference
> > call). Would it be possible, and legal, to use an implementation such
> > as this to create an extension that gets recorded such that the number
> > of licenses required to record a conference call would be n+1, rather
> than
> n*2?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Rob Morin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100930/bd08841c/attachment-0001.html