[Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session
anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Thu Sep 30 11:25:50 PDT 2010
he's trying to tell you to use the conference's recording mechanism
instead of recording the channel in the conference. The conference
uses raw audio only so if you use that, there is no further decoding.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Rob Morin <rmorin at blie-ent.com> wrote:
> Requiring 2*n g729 licenses because of the way it is built into the
> conference is exactly the point. I'm wondering, is there legally a way to
> alter the implementation such that n+1 is the proper number of licenses?
> Would creating a "phantom channel" for the recording achieve that?
> Just a thought,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian West [mailto:brian at freeswitch.org]
> Sent: 09/29/2010 5:27 PM
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] serious problem in record_session
> You know recording is built into the conference itself.
> On Sep 29, 2010, at 2:22 PM, Rob Morin wrote:
>> Two items, one for John, and one for the community:
>> 1. Did you (John) ever get this working?
>> 2. There has been discussion that if the calls are g729, that 2*n
>> licenses are required (where n is the number of legs on a conference
>> call). Would it be possible, and legal, to use an implementation such
>> as this to create an extension that gets recorded such that the number
>> of licenses required to record a conference call would be n+1, rather than
>> Thank you,
>> Rob Morin
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Anthony Minessale II
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users