[Freeswitch-users] Usage of optional argument -bf ?
anthony.minessale at gmail.com
Tue Sep 21 08:51:41 PDT 2010
This patch appears to not work.
I removed it and re-opened the jira it was submitted from.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Patrick Lists
<freeswitch-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Hi all,
> In the output of freeswitch -h I noticed there is a (for me) new
> argument -bf that FreeSWITCH can be started with. Is -bf supposed to
> work in combination with -nc where it will block until it has fully
> started and then goes into the background?
> When I start FreeSWITCH (git from yesterday) as follows:
> /opt/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch -u freeswitch -g freeswitch -core -bf -nc
> then FreeSWITCH does start, goes into the background but I can not
> connect to it with fs_cli on the same host. When I omit -bf from the
> line above then all is well and I can connect with fs_cli.
> I'm interested in the blocking part because when you do
> # service freeswitch start
> right now it will immediately return [ OK ] but I prefer to get an ok
> after FreeSWITCH actually has fully started.
> Did I misunderstood the -bf arg?
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
Anthony Minessale II
MSN:anthony_minessale at hotmail.com
GTALK/JABBER/PAYPAL:anthony.minessale at gmail.com
IRC: irc.freenode.net #freeswitch
FreeSWITCH Developer Conference
sip:888 at conference.freeswitch.org
googletalk:conf+888 at conference.freeswitch.org
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users