[Freeswitch-users] 100 parallel calls not possible (Performance problems)

[Daniel Neubert]

Hi,

have you checked your switch.conf.xml configuration for 
"sessions-per-second" value?

<param name="sessions-per-second" value="30"/>

Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Daniel Neubert


On 28.07.2010 08:54, Durmuş Ali Öztürk wrote:
> I will try to set up a fs system on CentOS, maybe the performance will 
> be better.
>
> I am sorry but I dont understand the difference between cps and number 
> of active session.
>
> If fs has 10 active sessions (with media), then the call per second 
> should be 10 too??
>
> 2010/7/28 Phillip Jones-2 [via freeswitch-users] <[hidden email] 
> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5345283&i=0>>
>
>     >> The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get the
>     latest source
>     code
>
>     That would seem like a reasonable thing to do.....
>
>     >> In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while
>     calling parallel
>     30 number?
>
>     In my (limited) experience there are two important things to control:
>
>     1) call per second
>     2) Total number of active sessions
>
>     Calls per seconds appears (to me) to have a greater effect on the
>     CPU. So at 1 call per second I would be looking at your CPU
>     utilization and if it is maxing out then reducing that rate.
>
>     My point being here that your box *may* be capable of handling 100
>     or 1000 sessions, if the cps is lowered.
>
>     HTH
>
>     On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Durmuş Ali Öztürk <[hidden email]
>     <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=0>> wrote:
>
>
>         The compiler flag is not found in my solution, should I get
>         the latest source
>         code?
>
>         In case of a timing problem, why it does not occured while
>         calling parallel
>         30 number?
>         --
>         View this message in context:
>         http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html
>         <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5340996.html?by-user=t&by-user=t>
>         Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>         [hidden email]
>         <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=1>
>
>         http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>         UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>         http://www.freeswitch.org
>         <http://www.freeswitch.org?by-user=t&by-user=t>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>     [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5344088&i=2>
>     http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>     UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>     http://www.freeswitch.org
>     <http://www.freeswitch.org?by-user=t&by-user=t&by-user=t>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     View message @
>     http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5344088.html
>     <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5344088.html?by-user=t>
>
>     To unsubscribe from Re: 100 parallel calls not possible
>     (Performance problems), click here.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: 100 parallel calls not possible 
> (Performance problems) 
> <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/100-parallel-calls-not-possible-Performance-problems-tp5339029p5345283.html>
> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive 
> <http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/> at Nabble.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100728/12369caa/attachment-0001.html