[Freeswitch-users] eavesdroping!

[Rupa Schomaker]

if he just wants to listen to a shoutcast recording of an in-flight call,
there is no need for a conference or eavesdrop.  uuid_record to shoutcast is
sufficient.  If he wants to talk on the call... well, shoutcast won't be
good 'cause that is one way.  he would need a real sip client and then
eavesdrop would be the "right" way IMO or a conference...  They can all be
pushed to a conference on-demand if necessary.

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:50 AM, David Swardstrom <
dswardstrom at remotelink.com> wrote:

>
> If the call is part of a conference and you want to listen to the
> conference,
> you should be able to the
> same thing by recording the conference to an icecast server.
>
> As I noted in another recent post, I think that you need a bridge
> (conference) to connect two
> channels so that you are in a conference. No one has contradicted me on
> this
> yet.
>
> I think this would not interfere with any automatic recording of the
> conference if you used a
> control language such as JS or LUA to control this capability.
> I cannot be 100% certain that two recordings can be simultaneously attached
> to a conference
> without testing it or getting some assurance from someone who knows.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://freeswitch-users.2379917.n2.nabble.com/eavesdroping-tp5296543p5298076.html
> Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
-Rupa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20100715/29ab30ac/attachment.html