[Freeswitch-users] 1.0.4 vs. trunk vs. bugs

[Lon Baker]

Jason,

Yes. I saw that. But, quite a few times I have found the trunk unstable or broken. Its why I'm proposing the changes.

To be clear, I'm not in anyway impugning the quality or expertise of the dev team. They are doing amazing work! 

I'm looking down the road. As the project grows and FS becomes a critical piece of any company's infrastructure a clear distinction between "stable" and "development" branches are pretty standard in project the scope of FS.

Lon

On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Jason White wrote:

> Lon Baker <lon at kickasspixels.com> wrote:
> 
>> The development branch is where feature requests and non-critical bugs
>> reports would be filed for the next production release.
>> 
>> The current process leaves a gap between production ready and
>> development code that may become greater over time.
> 
> Did you read the statements by FreeSWITCH developers indicating that the svn
> trunk is usually more stable than "released" versions, and that this is at
> least partly due to a lack of testers/testing prior to release?
> 
> A change of policy isn't going to address those underlying problems.
> 
> For the record, I don't favour the proposed change.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org